How to use the power of Google to prevent anachronisms
Posted by CM under Writing on Sun 13 May 2007
ou’ve heard it a million times. “Such and such is an anachronism,” somebody tells you.
Really? Some examples are, as Tessa Dare points out, “I am sorry.” Some people say that the use of “I’m sorry” as an apology is anachronistic, dating only from the early 1900s. False! Tessa pulls up three examples from Pride & Prejudice alone.But maybe you haven’t memorized Jane Austen like Tessa has. Perfectly fine, I assure you–Google can help you out. Go to http://books.google.com. Insert the phrase you’re looking for “I am sorry” and then restrict it by date, by adding: “date:1750-1820.” Lo and behold, “I am sorry” is used in Pilgrim’s Progress, as well as by Edmund Burke (surely a crusty old man, if ever there were one).
Ditto for “bloody hell,” something that Leigh mentioned that others complained about. And we find that Regency Misses could well have heard both “bloody hell-hounds” (1772) and “bloody hell-kites” (1813). (I particularly like “You blazing imp of melted pitch!”), even if she never heard the stable hand talk.
I’ve also been told that “debutante” wasn’t used until the 1830s. This is wrong, too; it shows up in 1809 in the Quarterly Review.
On Smart Bitches, someone complains about “bloke” being modern–except it was used in 1750, in the supposedly “modern” sense.
It takes about ten seconds to check your instincts. Those of you who want to nitpick anachronisms are free to do so, but don’t do it before you’ve checked Google Books. It’s free, it’s easy, and it stops you from looking like a complete idiot. I have found that sometimes the worst people to read my writing are those who write in the historical era. There are so many misconceptions that historical romance writers have, that are completely unfounded.









May 14th, 2007 at 5:39 am
Hey, this is a great tip. I’m reading a book by an author-who-shall-remain-nameless and the first scene was chock full of things that jumped out at me as anachronisms, some based on stuff I’d heard in the blogosphere. One of which was “hello” (which I believe to be related to the telephone) but others were “I’m sorry” and “bloody hell”, which I’m pleased to learn are not anti-Regency after all. Thanks for the link!
May 14th, 2007 at 9:28 am
Heh, I once had someone say “shag” sounded modern. Hey, it’s from 1780, my friends. My Victorians can shag all they like *g!
May 14th, 2007 at 10:13 am
Oh, that’s how you do the dates! Thank you!
Alice
May 14th, 2007 at 10:55 am
I think I love you, CM. Seriously. I might just kick the husband to the curb… This kind of nitpicking makes me insane.
May 14th, 2007 at 11:09 am
Well, Chris, if you live in Massachusetts . . . .
Jacqueline: I had no idea about shag! Impressive. I just checked the OED (hard to do with Google, because you get all this stuff about shag carpets and dogs with shag), and you’re absolutely right.
But as to “hello”–there are some close substitutes, like “hallo” which appear much earlier. Or “hoy.” Still, “hello” is a hard one to do without!
May 14th, 2007 at 3:55 pm
CM, you’re my idol! Google books it is. I’m having fond memories of the time you found the answer to my Sumantran tiger question before I finished typing it. How do ya do it?!
May 14th, 2007 at 4:17 pm
I do nothing but channel the almighty Google. Google reigns supreme.
May 14th, 2007 at 5:54 pm
Thanks for the google tip. Never even thought of it. And I so agree with you when you say some of the worst people are historical writers themselves.
May 15th, 2007 at 11:15 am
Thanks for the link! I tend to use yahoo more than google- that needs to change.
CM- I would love to see you go into business as a ‘fact checker’ or some such thing. Maybe that could be your next book. ‘True History for Regency Set Romance’. Or ‘Blast, the Bloke Shagged Me: A Lexicon for Writers.’
May 15th, 2007 at 11:30 am
In some senses of the word, I am a fact checker.
May 17th, 2007 at 6:13 pm
I’m a huge fan of the Online Etymology Dictionary. My other secret weapon is my father-in-law’s copy of the Oxford English Dictionary. One of these days, I may have to subscribe to the OED online.