Bemoaning words
Posted by CM under Writing on Tue 15 May 2007
f you haven’t noticed, I really like words. And one of my favorite words ever is just not usable in a historical.
Metastasize.
It’s a beauty of a word. There isn’t another word out there that can quite capture the sheer virulence of metastasization. It’s a word that carries with it all the fright of uncontrollable growth along with the impotent fury of the Sorcerer’s Apprentice. It’s a really loaded word.
Similar in meaning, yet opposite in form, are two other truly beautiful words: Event horizon and critical mass. Both, of course, have that delicious feel of a point of no return. But they’re opposite in a sense. Once you pass the event horizon, your choices are limited. Light can’t escape; how could you? Critical mass is almost the opposite: Until you reach that critical mass, you’re inert, unable to undergo a chain reaction that fundamentally changes the nature of things.
In some ways, it almost aches to not be able to use these words. But it’s a challenge, too.
So which words do you miss, if you write historicals? And likewise, if you write contemporaries, are there any words from historicals that you miss? Do you ever wish that your modern character could say, in a fit of rage:
Damnation seize every limb of your body! What, you bloody hell-kite! you blazing imp of melted pitch! dare you stand there, and wag your devil’s-jaw at me? Flaming oil and sulphur be my lot in Satan’s arse, if I don’t teach you better manners, whoreson!









May 16th, 2007 at 4:54 am
Somehow I’m hearing Dan Ackroyd saying, “Jane, you ignorant slut,” which seems to have transitioned nicely from the Regency period to period SNL.
lt’s not so much the words I miss, but putting characters in reasonably appropriate situations given the restrictions of the time. And delving into psychology is impossible when you can’t use the terminology.
May 16th, 2007 at 7:10 am
Libertine comes to mind. Now and then I want to describe a modern male as a libertine and a rake, or maybe a cad. I think I can get away with cad sometimes, then I’ll get called on it.
Alice
May 16th, 2007 at 10:38 am
“Ego” is one word and concept it’s hard to weed out.
Today I’m mourning “minefield,” of course. And “bedsprings.” “Shockwave” was one that’s still in GOTH, just because I couldn’t think of a better word. I figured, I’ll let an editor call me on it, and then I’ll think of something.
May 16th, 2007 at 1:21 pm
Oh, Maggie and Eve, I am so with you on ego and psychology. Freud changed everything. You can’t even really make snarky comments about phallic symbols or overcompensation. And there are times when you really, really want to.
And Alice: It’s true. These days, our choices are either the positive “stud” or “man-slut.” Which is really too bad. We don’t have libertines any longer. We only have libertarians, and those are a completely separate matter. I feel the loss excruciatingly.
May 16th, 2007 at 3:06 pm
Not so much words as I miss some contemporary sayings, like ‘no pun intended.’
May 16th, 2007 at 3:25 pm
Actually, Bev:
1789:
http://books.google.com/books?id=6tchAAAAMAAJ&q=%22no+pun+intended%22+date:1750-1850&dq=%22no+pun+intended%22+date:1750-1850&pgis=1
May 17th, 2007 at 4:44 am
Hah! “Flaming oil and sulphur be my lot in Satan’s arse.” Too. Funny.
I like to pepper my conversation with antiquated phrases, so if I ever chose to write a contemporary I would probably get the voice all wrong.
May 17th, 2007 at 8:33 am
Electricity and all it’s mechanical bits n pieces are the things I always catch myself on…
May 17th, 2007 at 10:26 am
Hot diggidy dog. Here I was thinking it was a thoroughly modern saying. Thanks CM
May 17th, 2007 at 10:45 pm
I miss the poetry of regency speak. But I don’t miss the “my lords” one bit. I do wish my contemporary heroines could say “bloody hell”.
I like my regency heros to “get lucky” now and then too. Perhaps that’s why I don’t write regency anywhere in the real world.
I despise the word metastasize.
May 17th, 2007 at 10:53 pm
Bwa, I liked your quote! =)