ne of my earliest childhood memories is clutching my brother’s hand as we crouched under a desk, hoping the police wouldn’t find us.
Okay. That will give you a distorted view of the neighborhood I grew up in, and so let me give some context. One of the neighbor girls routinely teased me. On this particular day, she had told me my dress was ugly. Then she stole my chalk. Since I was about four years old, I burst into tears. My brother saw this, and being older, he dealt with the situation as only a mature boy of fourteen can: He picked up a piece of decorative bark and hurled it at our neighbor’s forehead. It split her scalp and she bled like the dickens. She had to get three stitches.
Did I mention her dad was a cop?
“CM,” you are saying, “that’s all well and good. But what does this have to do with Legalese?”
I’ll tell you. My original version of Legalese had the stupendous title of “Dower Corrupts.” Which, incidentally, I still love even though it is an absolutely horrible title for a romance novel. In any event, Dower Corrupts was a book about money–specifically, an heiress who could buy herself everything she wanted, except for the things that money can’t buy. And she met a man who also had pots and pots of money, and together they figured out that money sucked and then got rid of most of it.
“CM,” you protest, “you have not yet got to the throwing of decorative bark.”
Right. I’m getting there. That version lasted about 3000 words, and it was axed when a critique partner asked some very pointed questions and I shamefacedly mumbled and said, “But–but–but if I don’t do it this way, everyone’s going to look at her and say, ‘You are stupendously wealthy. Get over yourself.’” And she rolled her eyes and said, “You know, I’m still thinking that.” And I cursed her silently–or not so silently, as the case may be–because she was right, and I started again.
The next version of the book that I wrote was about money. It was about a girl who had a stupendous amount of money and could buy anything she wanted, except the things money didn’t buy. And then she met a man who had all the things that money couldn’t buy, but was a little short on the money parts himself. And sparks flew because they were totally outside each other’s experience.
This is the version that I’ve been writing for lo these last seven months. For seven months, I have deluded myself into thinking that I am writing a book about money, but on a rescan of the pages I’ve written, “money” itself has cropped up, say, twice, and other things drive the emotions, the plot, and the characters.
And here we get to the decorative bark. I am not writing a book about money. I am writing a book about the most important thing money can’t buy: family. And so my proposed finale, which was supposed to be all about how they get rid of the money, no longer actually works. Because money has no emotional weight in my book. What does have emotional weight is that damned piece of decorative bark. You see, I have always known that my brother loves me, no matter how prickly he may be. When I cast my heroine’s brother as the villain in this little play about money, I have never been satisfied. He’s gotten dark–very dark. I planned to have him do all sorts of nefarious things, but halfway through the book, he up and quit doing those dark things in a scene that I still have to rewrite because it doesn’t quite work yet. Still.
At some point, I realized that the money had nothing to do with the happily ever after. My problem was that I could envision a happily ever after with any amount of money–but I couldn’t see a happily ever after with her villainous brother clutching all the decorative bark and laughing maniacally. Once I realized that, I found my black moment. It was blacker than anything I had imagined. It had my hero doing something that still makes my skin crawl, and doing it for the only reason I can imagine he would do it. And then, he had to dig himself out of the deep, deep hole he dug for himself.
Naturally, there’s only one way for him to do it.
Decorative Bark. And that’s all I’m saying. You’ll notice that I’ve blown past the 384-page stopping point by a long margin, and I’ve upped my estimated point for “The End” somewhere to 420.
So you tell me. What’s the theme of your book? Is it better than “decorative bark”? Can it possibly be worse?









October 28th, 2007 at 8:52 pm
Ooh, CM, I admit to salivating over your Black Moment (and everything else you mentioned re: Legalese - sign me up to read, please). Excellent post. This weekend at the Emerald City conference, I heard a lot about theme and “core story.” Jayne Ann Krentz/Amanda Quick/Jayne Castle had lots to say about core story in her chat and her keynote, and other workshops took that and ran with it too. So tickled for you that you got to yours. Sounds lovely.
October 28th, 2007 at 9:07 pm
Having read bits of Legalese, I will not go the “sounds lovely” route because I know when you say dark and horrible, you mean dark and horrible. HOWEVER. Now I am insanely curious to know what you changed! I know that money thing was a real sticking point. I can’t wait to see what you’ve come up with.
October 28th, 2007 at 9:18 pm
Well, I think that’s fabulous and I love dark. Am waiting on pins and needles for the outcome. My book turns out to be about forgiveness, which I sort of knew all along. What I didn’t know until I finished finished and printed it out and sent it off was that I too needed to forgive certain people in my life. That alone was worth writing the book. So I totally get it about your bark. Ruff!
October 29th, 2007 at 5:22 am
Darcy, we’ll see. I’ve “got” mine, but I still need to nail it down in text.
And Lacey–most of the dark parts you and I talked about simply don’t exist anymore. They just . . . don’t. There’s a different kind of darkness instead, and I hope that this kind of darkness has a lot more light. The odd thing about the black moment is that I wonder whether what Oliver does is either (a) irredeemable or (b) not bad enough. Depending on my mood. Isn’t that crazy?
And India, that is both wacky and completely understandable. Sometimes, we don’t know how much we’re writing for ourselves until we get to the end. And then we say, “Oh, gosh–I guess that is true, isn’t it!”
October 29th, 2007 at 11:17 am
The odd thing about the black moment is that I wonder whether what Oliver does is either (a) irredeemable or (b) not bad enough. Depending on my mood. Isn’t that crazy?
Actually, I get you. My current WIP’s hero is supposed to have a seriously bad rep, which means he needs to have a seriously short fuse or the rep thing won’t make sense. When I sent a couple scenes to the MMs, I worried they’d say, “Erica, this guy has a violent temper in a scary way, not a sexy way.” and almost toned it down just to prevent that reaction. And then, when they said yum instead of yuck, I started thinking, “Oh no! He’s not bad enough! Bring on more bad!” and the like. (Which I didn’t do, either. I’m leaving as-is for now.)
Am also super-curious about Legalese… Can’t wait to read it! =)
October 29th, 2007 at 5:05 pm
Isn’t it strange, Erica, how characters appear to other people? At this point, I have more than 100 pages of stuff that my CPs haven’t seen, and it makes me totally antsy. No idea how any of this will come off. But here goes nothing–let’s see how much I can finish tonight.
October 30th, 2007 at 9:32 am
What a tease you are! For months, I have been hearing “I finally have the fix for my book! It’s brilliant! It’s perfect!” Yeah, well, it is yet to be revealed. And I’m getting cranky.
For some bizarre reason, I thought my current book was going to be about “color” - her bringing color and verve into his life, him settling some racial issues… yeah, none of that really worked. Of course, it’s really about “truth” - being truthful with oneself and others.
Hey, CM - now that you’ve written a book about hurling decorative bark, how about one about throwing a fruit? Like, say, an orange… or a lime? Maybe not.
October 30th, 2007 at 9:41 am
I’m sorry, I’m sorry! I only have had fixes for small parts of the book, not the whole thing. And they’re not all implemented. If you were to see it right now, you’d tell me I was completely bonkers. It’s like ping pong. It completely sucks.
Also, you are TOTALLY PSYCHIC, because the scene I’m working on in the Book Formerly Known as Ornithology involves the graphic dismemberment of an orange. It is not, however, thrown.
October 31st, 2007 at 12:49 am
Hmmm, decorative bark. And will we dislike the hero in this black moment, I wonder…
I’m going to jump to book three and say that book is definitely about forgiveness and finding your way back to the light. Somewhat a departure from the lighter tone of the first two. Also, being comfortable in your own skin. I wish there was one word for that.
October 31st, 2007 at 8:33 am
Your decorative bark sounds wonderful.
November 2nd, 2007 at 8:05 pm
CM, you’re an awful tease—What is the black moment?!!!
Seriously, if you don’t send me this book soon—I might have to hurt some books. *g*
And if oranges don’t work, I hear there’s a plethura of lemons in English fields.