Archive for January, 2009

Lawsuits

Monday, January 19th, 2009

Even though I don’t list it in my tongue-in-cheek biography, I am a lawyer–even though I am not now a practicing lawyer.  One of the things I think I learned as a lawyer is that civil lawsuits are an ineffective way of making people happy–and people often file suit, not out of coldly rational calculus, but because they are trying to fill an unmet emotional need.  It may sound great to win a giant verdict, but 95% of the time, a favorable ruling is an ephemeral brass ring that disappears once you touch it.

I started thinking about this a few days ago, when Kristin posted on her blog about cover consultations.  One of the commenters suggested that someday, a publisher would be sued, and an injunction obtained, over cover consultation.  It might happen one day–but it struck me as such a horribly wrong-headed approach to the matter, that I’ve been thinking about the problem presented for days.

It won’t surprise you to hear that some lawyers advise clients, when faced with a potential lawsuit, to avoid admitting guilt or providing information.  After all, if you say, “I’m sorry, it was my fault,” in court, they will ask you, “Hey, didn’t you say it was your fault?”  And you will have to answer yes, and then you will lose.  But there was a rather startling study produced by the Journal of American Medicine a few years ago that found that in malpractice cases, lawsuits went down if someone sat down with the people in question, told them precisely what went wrong, admitted fault and responsibility, and told them how they’d taken measures to prevent such accidents in the future.

Why?  Personally, I think it’s because most people don’t file lawsuits because they’re trying to get the money or because they honestly believe it is the best step to take in their careers.  Most people file lawsuits because they’ve been hurt, they are angry, and they want to feel vindicated.  They file lawsuits because they’ve stopped seeing the person they care about as human and real, and they see them only as an adversary to be ground into the dust.  Adding that human touch–letting the patients know that the doctors did care, and responded to their pain and wanted to do what was right–made a huge difference.  Ultimately, people know that a lawsuit will never bring Grandma back.  But being treated by the medical professionals as if you are human instead of a walking, talking liability helped them channel their grief and anger in some way other than lashing out legally.

I’m not trying to say that lawsuits serve no purpose.  They do, obviously, and they’ve done great (and terrible) things for our society.  I’m not even trying to say that you shouldn’t sue doctors for malpractice.  If a doctor is incompetent, she should not be treating patients, and I approve of methods that make it impossible for that doctor to earn a living.

But I do think that your life will be happier and more free of stress if you try not to find a lawsuit everywhere you look.  This is especially true of publishing contracts.  Most of what I saw in my publishing contract was about two sides working together.  I’m going to give them a timely product that is the best work I can do.  They’re going to let me know how to make it even better, and I’m going to listen–because we both want the same thing, which is for my books to capture as many readers as possible.

And I don’t see how I could have that relationship if I thought of the contract, and our agreement, as an adversarial one.

Sometimes, this relationship breaks down.  (When it does, it leads to cringeworthy train wrecks on Dear Author that leave me noting to myself that I will never, ever under any circumstances work for a publishing house where managers tell authors to shut up or sue.)  But most of the time, you don’t hear anything about it–except thanks, from authors to editors and publishing house staff, for all their hard work.

The Historical is Dead

Friday, January 16th, 2009

Two years ago, all I was hearing was how dead historicals were.  Historicals were dead, dead, dead.  They were going the way of the dodo and chick lit.  If you wanted to get published, you had to write vampires and werewolves–everyone knew that.

Today, I did a quick tally in my head of people I know–and by “know” I mean, have met in person and talked with–who have debut historical novels coming out from major New York houses in the upcoming year-or-something.  By my count, that number stands at eleven.

Here are the debut authors in that once-dead genre (note that release dates are tentative the farther you get out):

All that doom and gloom two years ago?  It turned out kinda like this:

Exciting News

Thursday, January 15th, 2009

I have to admit, calling this “news” is a bit of a stretch, since I’ve been sort-of-not-really sitting on this piece of information for a few months.  But I’ve never formally announced it on my blog, and so I figured I should do so.

PROOF BY SEDUCTION will not be my publishing debut.

There.  I’ve said it.

HQN has asked me to participate in a Christmas-themed anthology for 2009, and so my offical debut will be a novella that I am writing for that collection.  The other novellas will be from Mary Balogh and Nicola Cornick (they are, I think, previously published novellas for the other two authors–when I have more details, I’ll let you know.)  It should be released in October of 2009.

As for my little novella….  well, if you want to find out more details, you’ll just have to come back and see what you get, right?

Five Awesome January Romances

Wednesday, January 14th, 2009

So, I’ve read five books that come out in January, all of which have been beyond incredible.  It’s been an embarrassment of riches over here.  All five qualify as romances in the broad sense of the word:  There’s a happily ever after at the end, and the love story is an integral part of the book (although in all cases, the love story is not the only part of the book).  Of course, not all of them are marketed as romances–but that’s another matter entirely.

The interesting thing is that while I love all these books, the heat level varies wildly from nearly no sexual content in one of them, to an erotic romance involving multiple partners.  If you’ve been wondering what to read this January, look no further.

In order of heat, from lightest to hottest:

  • Hotel on the Corner of Bitter and Sweet, by Jamie Ford.
    This is the novel with little sexual content, and this book is about so many things–love between races, the Japanese internment (and I can’t help but think of the parallels in this time), patriotism, and families on all levels.  I loved this book.  I have wanted to read this book since I read about it on Kristin’s blog, and reading her editorial letter about this book is what convinced me I wanted her as an agent, because if she could make me long to read a book that much, I figured she had to be the best at what she did.  You don’t want to ask what I did to get an advance copy, but I will be buying extras when it is released for my mother and for a former boss, who will both appreciate it.
  • Perfect Chemistry, by Simone Elkeles.
    Even though this book was released almost a week ago, it took me forever to find a copy of it.  My local Borders was out within two days, and when I special ordered it, they couldn’t get another copy right away–it turns out that this book is going into a second printing.  This is a Young Adult novel, but there is a sex scene.  It’s central to the whole book, though, and it takes place (mostly) off screen.  This book is so beautifully written, and even though I didn’t think I would like the heroine (she is perfect and a cheerleader), Simone made me fall in love with her in the very first chapter.  (Full disclosure:  Simone is also one of my agent’s clients and a member of my RWA chapter, but I swear I wouldn’t be saying this if I didn’t love the book anyway.)
  • Marrying The Captain, by Carla Kelly.
    Carla Kelly is a new-to-me author.  As in, how on earth is it that I have never read a Carla Kelly before now?  In any event, Marrying the Captain is a Regency.  The sensuality is fairly light (although there are sex scenes), but the tension is beautiful, and the character development, the slow build up in this novel, is fantastic.
  • Talk Me Down, by Victoria Dahl.
    Damn.  I’ve really loved all of Victoria’s awesome historicals, but Talk Me Down just took everything I loved about those books up a notch.  Her heroine was wounded–both because of fairly recent events involving an ex, and also because she kept everyone at a certain arms’ length.  This book contained one of the most poignant and beautiful love scenes that I’ve ever read.  If you’re wondering–it’s the photographs.  You’ll know it when you get there.
  • Stranger, by Megan Hart.
    I’ve heard a lot about Megan Hart, but just never got around to reading her until now.  This book was incredible–think, kick me in the gut awesome.  It was dark and edgy without being about abuse or any other truly unthinkable things.  I fell in love with the heroine right from the get-go, and I ached for her to be happy.  This book is an erotic romance–there is a lot of sex, including sex with strangers–but it is also an incredibly emotional read.  One of the things I’ve noticed is that sometimes, authors try to inject emotion into their books by making everything larger than life.  He’s not just ticked, he’s furious.  She’s not just jealous, she is smoldering with desire.  I find that this emotional magnification doesn’t work for me.  In fact, it usually has the opposite effect.  It leaves me feeling disconnected from the characters, as their emotions are too large for the events of the day.  Megan Hart gets that, and I think one of the most powerful things about this book is how the heroine understates her emotion.  The effect for me, is magnificent.

There aren’t many months out there where, in the first two weeks, my reading material is this incredible.  So you tell me:  What are you reading, and is it this awesome?  Because I’m almost afraid to read anything else, for fear of breaking this streak of perfection. And now that I’ve looked up all these books on Amazon to link to them, I notice that two of them are agent-brothers and sisters, and the other three are all from different imprints of my publisher. That was entirely unintentional, and I’m guessing that when I do this again next February (and I will do it again!) hopefully I will have greater variety.

Covers, Part II: Movie Actors

Tuesday, January 13th, 2009

HQN gave me a big huge form to fill out for my cover art.  (Suzanne McMinn has posted about the system, so if you want to get an idea what it’s like visit her site.)  I actually found the form really fun, in part because I’m not a hugely concretely visual person.

They asked me if there were any actors who looked like my characters.  My initial answer, which I figured would not start my relationship with the Art Department off on the right footing, was, “Probably, but I don’t know who they are.”

Some people pick actors to represent their characters.  My problem is that I don’t remember actor names.  In fact, I am awful with names and face-recognition.  When watching movies I can barely remember the guy’s name in the movie, and if he changes his clothes drastically, I’ll turn to Mr. Milan and prod him and say, “who is that dude that just showed up onscreen?”  And Mr. Milan will be like, uh, the main character, the guy we’ve been watching for two hours?

So my first strategy was to sit down with Mr. Milan and have him list names of movie actors.  “Ben Affleck,” says he.  “Ben Affleck,” I dutifully repeat, typing it into Google Images search.  Images come up.  Ugly images.  My nose wrinkles.  “Okay,” I finally say, “That dude is not Gareth.  He’s ugly.”  No really.  Ben Affleck is ugly.  Seriously ugly.  I can’t believe it.  I know I’ve heard of him; I just did not realize that he was ugly.

“Fine.  Orlando Bloom,” he says, knowing that I actually think Bloom is cute.  But the answer is already no–Orlando Bloom always looks like he’s sharing a private joke with the world and Gareth is not so much into smiling.  So that is a no go.

We go through about twenty more names.  For some reason, Mr. Milan keeps feeding me extremely awkward looking dudes.  He explains that he thought I wanted someone that looked different.  Different?  Possibly.  Ugly?  No.  Finally he mentions John Cusack, I look up John Cusack, who is all wrong but at least cute, and I say, fine, John Cusack.

I e-mail my critique partners with the good news–which I ought to have done immediately, without bothering with Mr. Milan, who I now know has terrible taste in men–and Tessa says immediately, no, no, he’s Viggo Mortenson!  I look up Viggo when he is not being Aragorn and lo and behold.  He is, in fact, Gareth.

The moral of the story is that my critique partners have better taste in men than my husband.

So here are my main characters.  Hi, guys.  Nice to meet you.

Gareth (Viggo Mortenson)

Jenny (Laura Fraser)

Jenny (Laura Fraser)

Covers!

Monday, January 12th, 2009

Over the last handful of days, I’ve been filling out some basic information as a prelude to starting work on the cover of my debut, PROOF BY SEDUCTION.  This, more than anything–more than the deal announcement on Publisher’s Marketplace, or even signing the contract and shipping it to Canada–has made the sale seem like it really happened.  My book will have a cover.  It will be produced in a format other than Courier New double spaced, and it will be bound and everything.  Whoa!

But along those lines, my amazing critique partner, Tessa Dare, just got her covers for her back-to-back trilogy from Ballentine.  Her trilogy starts with Goddess of the Hunt, released on July 28, 2009, and I can’t wait for everyone to be able to read this book.  It sold at auction, and once you start reading it, you will know why.  As her critique partner I read it through several times–and let me tell you, there is no book I would rather have read 10 times.  I loved it every time I read it, and you will, too.  The most amazing thing about this trilogy is that with a first book this good…  the second one, Surrender of a Siren, is even better.

So here are her covers!  Now go preorder these books.  :)

Goddess of the HuntSurrender of a SirenA Lady of Persuasion

Maximizing Your Productivity

Friday, January 9th, 2009

Kay Cassidy is the winner of the 2008 Golden Heart for her Young Adult novel The Cinderella Society, which will be coming from Egmont in Spring of 2010.  She’s also got an MBA, and she is more organized than . . . well, I would say more organized than me, but since my desk bears a strong resemblance to a volcanic eruption, that is not saying much.  In any event, Kay has been blogging for the last couple of days, giving productivity tips for authors.  Things like, how to organize yourself so that you can get work done, and how to save things so that you can find them later.

To me, what Kay proposes sounds like something between heaven and magic.  Right now, my organization is to stack things up in a five-foot pile on my desk, and hope that if the cat knocks the pile over, it gets restacked before the dog chews up anything important.  I desperately needed this.  She’s convinced me to go digital in 2009 and buy a receipt scanner.

If you’re interested, check out her awesome posts here, and here.

Uh, wow?

Thursday, January 8th, 2009

So apparently the little piece of information that I did not write my own query letter has touched off a bit of a firestorm.

Over on Nathan Bransford’s blog, there’s a lengthy (and really interesting) discussion about whether it’s okay to write your own query letters.  Some people say that a query letter is your own work and anything else is dishonest.  Other people say, whatever works, works.  Jennifer Jackson says, unequivocally, no, you should write your own query letter.

I do want to point out one thing, which I hope doesn’t piss off anybody.  On this point, the interests of agents and writers do not align 100%.  As a writer, you want someone to pay maximum attention to your pages.  But an agent wants to focus her very valuable time only on the projects that are most likely to pay dividends.  If I were an agent, I think I would shiver in fear at the thought of everyone being able to produce really awesome queries–because then how do you allocate your valuable time?  How do you filter out manuscripts?  As an unagented writer, I didn’t care about any of those concerns.  I just wanted to hop the filter.

But I do have to say that I think it worked in my case for two reasons.  First, the query letter that Sherry wrote was one that I rewrote until it was in my voice.  Sherry did an awesome job of highlighting the conflict.  And because she doesn’t do this regularly, and wasn’t getting paid for it, and read the pages and got the manuscript, she really understood the crux of the conflict in my book and to help me get it right in the query letter.  I doubt you could pay someone to do what Sherry did for me, and I seriously doubt that someone could start a query service that would make money on such an endeavor.  And when Sherry sent me the version with the conflict highlighted, she specifically did not edit it–so that I would be forced to go and write it in my voice.

I wanted to hop the filter, but I also knew I wanted to hop the filter with the right agents.  And so I knew it was my responsibility to take what Sherry had given me and both make it representative of my voice, and make sure that it captured the heart of my book.  I wanted an agent to read it and think, “how cool”–and then read my pages and think, “yep, that’s what this query told me.”

In some sense, a query letter is like giving an agent a sniff of your book before they take a bite.  Have you ever bitten into something expecting raspberry, and gotten ketchup instead?  Even if you like ketchup, the difference between expectation and actual delivery will make you recoil.  I knew that if the query did not represent my book on all levels, it wouldn’t be a good tool for me in the long run.  So I didn’t send it out until I was sure that it represented my book.  More importantly, I also felt like the query letters I tried to write myself did not represent my book, either–they weren’t good enough for it–and so I wasn’t going to send them, either.

I think you should do as an author whatever works.  I don’t think it would work to have someone else write your query, and not have it represent your book, both in terms of plot summary, quality of writing, and voice.  And I think that if you don’t know what represents your voice and quality of writing and the plot of your book, you have bigger problems then a mere query letter.

Website Redesign

Wednesday, January 7th, 2009

I’m officially announcing that I’ve redone my website!

As 2009 approached, and I realized I was going to have published material out this year, I realized I wanted a newsletter (shameless plug:  sign up for my newsletter!).  This lead to a site redesign.  Among other things, my site now changes colors every month, and it takes a page from Google–on some major holidays, and on a few very minor ones that you wouldn’t think of as holidays as well, it changes in less subtle ways.

For a limited time, go see my website in the future–as it will look on October 31, 2009.  Spooky!

Beyond the fold, I talk about what I was smoking when I redid my website.

(more…)

Query Letter Outtakes

Tuesday, January 6th, 2009

Over on Kristin Nelson‘s blog, she is analyzing the query letter that I sent her.  Admittedly, at the time she had already requested the full, so it wasn’t a query query letter, but she does say she would have requested based on those pages.

This might give you the impression that I am actually capable of writing a good query letter.  That impression would be . . . insanely offbase.  If you’ve been following me, you know that Sherry Thomas wrote my query letter.

My own query letters for the book…. they sucked.  So I’m posting the outtakes on this blog.

(more…)


Courtney Milan’s Blog is proudly powered by WordPress
entries (RSS) and comments (RSS).
content © Courtney Milan, 2006-2009
author photo © Jovanka Novakovic | bauwerks.com
cover copyright © 2010 harlequin enterprises limited
cover art used by arrangement with harlequin enterprises limited. all rights reserved.
® and ™ are trademarks of harlequin enterprises limited and/or its affiliated companies, used under license
home \"home books \"books about \"about contact \"contact faqs \"faq articles \"articles