<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Copyright and the blind reader</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.courtneymilan.com/ramblings/2009/02/18/copyright-and-the-blind-reader/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.courtneymilan.com/ramblings/2009/02/18/copyright-and-the-blind-reader/</link>
	<description>historical romance on the blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 20:08:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Courtney Milan</title>
		<link>http://www.courtneymilan.com/ramblings/2009/02/18/copyright-and-the-blind-reader/comment-page-1/#comment-9076</link>
		<dc:creator>Courtney Milan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 19:14:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.courtneymilan.com/ramblings/?p=403#comment-9076</guid>
		<description>Maya, I have no idea what Canadian law is on the subject!  Disability law in the US is very complicated, and I just happened to know this particular piece of the puzzle.

Leigh, I don&#039;t think that the large-print books from the library are the same thing as books available through bookshare.

I&#039;m pretty sure you can order large-print versions of many books, and I&#039;m also pretty sure that the large-print programs would not be covered by the relevant law for blind-accessibility, which limits the availability of the programs for the visually impaired to those who can demonstrate a disability.

As to whether authors resent the library for giving readers an opportunity to read for free ... I would say it depends on the individual author!  I&#039;ve seen some authors express dismay about the library--or about ARCs being sold on eBay--or about paperbackswap--or about books being sold on Amazon.com for one cent a day after the book&#039;s release.  All of these things are legally allowed under copyright law (yes, even the ARCs that are sold on eBay!), and yes, I have heard authors grumble about all of these in some measure.  But I have also heard authors (myself included!) who do *not* grumble about any of them.

Personally, I am happy to get readers--however I get them!  I know that when finances were tight for me, I read a lot of authors through borrowing from friends/buying used/library use.  Now that I have more money, I am happy to support the authors I read for free by purchasing their books.  With a few notable exceptions, if I hadn&#039;t had free access, I would not have bought the books, period--I just didn&#039;t have the money.  I suspect the same is true for many people, and I would rather have 10,000 people read my book for free, with the potential that 10% of them might become fans, than have 10 people read it and pay.

It&#039;s possible I might feel differently if/when I get a fanbase that is larger than just Mom and Dad, and have a greater financial stake, but I&#039;d like to hope that won&#039;t change.  I believe in a strong open and free component to all content.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maya, I have no idea what Canadian law is on the subject!  Disability law in the US is very complicated, and I just happened to know this particular piece of the puzzle.</p>
<p>Leigh, I don&#8217;t think that the large-print books from the library are the same thing as books available through bookshare.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m pretty sure you can order large-print versions of many books, and I&#8217;m also pretty sure that the large-print programs would not be covered by the relevant law for blind-accessibility, which limits the availability of the programs for the visually impaired to those who can demonstrate a disability.</p>
<p>As to whether authors resent the library for giving readers an opportunity to read for free &#8230; I would say it depends on the individual author!  I&#8217;ve seen some authors express dismay about the library&#8211;or about ARCs being sold on eBay&#8211;or about paperbackswap&#8211;or about books being sold on Amazon.com for one cent a day after the book&#8217;s release.  All of these things are legally allowed under copyright law (yes, even the ARCs that are sold on eBay!), and yes, I have heard authors grumble about all of these in some measure.  But I have also heard authors (myself included!) who do *not* grumble about any of them.</p>
<p>Personally, I am happy to get readers&#8211;however I get them!  I know that when finances were tight for me, I read a lot of authors through borrowing from friends/buying used/library use.  Now that I have more money, I am happy to support the authors I read for free by purchasing their books.  With a few notable exceptions, if I hadn&#8217;t had free access, I would not have bought the books, period&#8211;I just didn&#8217;t have the money.  I suspect the same is true for many people, and I would rather have 10,000 people read my book for free, with the potential that 10% of them might become fans, than have 10 people read it and pay.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s possible I might feel differently if/when I get a fanbase that is larger than just Mom and Dad, and have a greater financial stake, but I&#8217;d like to hope that won&#8217;t change.  I believe in a strong open and free component to all content.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leigh</title>
		<link>http://www.courtneymilan.com/ramblings/2009/02/18/copyright-and-the-blind-reader/comment-page-1/#comment-9073</link>
		<dc:creator>Leigh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 15:39:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.courtneymilan.com/ramblings/?p=403#comment-9073</guid>
		<description>This is a little different, but the visually impared subject made me think of it. I often get books from the library (and many of them are in large print). Does the library just pay the regular amount for the book? It is like bookshare, in a way... do authors resent the library for giving readers an opportunity to read for free?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a little different, but the visually impared subject made me think of it. I often get books from the library (and many of them are in large print). Does the library just pay the regular amount for the book? It is like bookshare, in a way&#8230; do authors resent the library for giving readers an opportunity to read for free?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maya M.</title>
		<link>http://www.courtneymilan.com/ramblings/2009/02/18/copyright-and-the-blind-reader/comment-page-1/#comment-9060</link>
		<dc:creator>Maya M.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 21:05:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.courtneymilan.com/ramblings/?p=403#comment-9060</guid>
		<description>I had no idea about this (and am now curious whether it&#039;s the same here in Canada).  So, if providing reading material for the visually impaired is considered both a good deed as well as not losing a whole lot of potential royalties due to the tinyness of the market - does that mean that hearing-impaired people are provided with free movie/television material that has been modified to suit their needs, also?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had no idea about this (and am now curious whether it&#8217;s the same here in Canada).  So, if providing reading material for the visually impaired is considered both a good deed as well as not losing a whole lot of potential royalties due to the tinyness of the market &#8211; does that mean that hearing-impaired people are provided with free movie/television material that has been modified to suit their needs, also?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
