• 08Mar
    Categories: Food, Random Comments: 12

    Thus continues CM’s monthly blog-fest. Come July, I shall blog more. But for now, this rate is just fine.

    As I am sure you know, we have come up on the Season of the Devil. Oh, come now. Don’t stare at your computer screen in coy surprise. You know what I’m talking about. Yes, you. It’s obvious.

    Thin Mints. Samoas, too, but it’s really the Thin Mints that get me every time. Coworkers hawk them for their cute little girls. You see smiling faces bobbing above green uniforms outside every grocery store. Everywhere you turn, someone is selling Thin Mints. And they are so darned good. Plus, one fits into your mouth so easily, and it takes almost no time to chew it. One bite, and it crumbles into nothingness. And as we all know, nothingness cannot have calories.

    Unless nothingness is a Thin Mint. Curse you, Girl Scouts of America.

    So you tell me. Girl Scout Cookies: Evil? Or pure evil?

  • 09Feb

    You’ll notice that in my “goals” post for the year I did not mention “update blog regularly” as a goal. That is because there was no way to make it a goal (I originally typed “gaol”–how appropriate!) without interfering with two other goals–writing, and getting through my day job with a modicum of grace.

    So here I am with the erratic posting. And today I’m just going to mention that Ornithology–which has been given the temporary title of “The Making of Jenny Keeble”–finaled in NTRWA’s Great Expectations contest.

    Aside from, uh, the Golden Heart, this is the first contest I’ve entered these pages in. Notice I do not say, the first contest in which I’ve entered Ornithology–I entered the much older version in one (or is it two? Honestly, I don’t remember because I’ve blocked out the results) contest before. The judges were really unimpressed. So it’s nice to know that the completely rewritten pages have made a difference. Whew. I did not just waste those many hundreds of hours on the rewrite. At some point in the future, I may actually end up posting a blurb and an excerpt. But–that will have to wait until I’m not completely overwhelmed.

    Here’s hoping that everyone else has been having a wonderful and productive 2008 so far! I suck at posting, but I’m not really going to get better anytime in the next few months. Maybe later….

  • 21Jan

    A little more than a year ago, I sat down and said, “Ho hum. I shall write a book.” And since everyone up until that point agreed I was a pretty good writer, this seemed like a fantastic idea to me. I mean, if I can put words on a page in a fashion that sounds pretty decent, all I had to do was put a lot of them on a lot of pages. Right? Right?Heh. Yeah, I know.

    My first book–that would be Ornithology I–I learned how to write a scene. You can actually see it in the progression of the draft. I have a couple hundred pages of people sitting around and talking and dancing and stuff on a page and at the end I get to pages that start from a hook, go through a major event, and end on a hook. Yay, me!

    Of course, you notice there’s that problem of the first 300 pages where nothing happens. Oops….

    My second book–that would be Legalese–I learned how to write conflict and plot. I had to do some of those scenes over and over again to make them work, and it’s still far from perfect (I haven’t even thought about revising it yet!). “Ha ha,” I said. “I am a genius! Now I know how to write a book, and nothing will stop me, ever!”

    That faint snorting sound you hear is me. Because I turned back to book #1. Now, I have to tell you. There is basically no way I should have revised Book #1. Nothing happened for 300 pages. There was little external conflict, and not a lot of internal conflict. This was a book that should have been kicked under the bed and chalked up to a learning experience. But I didn’t want to do it. I liked my hero. (Heroine, I realized–not so much. Note to self: “clever” is a character trait, not a character.) I really liked my heroine’s brother. And I wasn’t ready to give up this story.

    I really should have given up. Last May, I wrote an intro that totally changed my heroine. It was fantabulous. It was perfect. It was something I sat on for two months before coming back to it and realizing that it sucked, too. I tried again in June. And September. By the time October had rolled around, I’d written maybe 30,000 words, here and there. New intros. Scenes in the middle. Just testing out ideas. None of them worked.

    In mid-November, I got the idea. The perfect idea. I wrote five pages. They were the first five pages I sent to my critique partners, who said, “I love it!” I did, too. And so I started rewriting.

    Of course I deleted those five pages, in case you were wondering. I kept . . . um . . . 300 words from the original version.

    And rewriting this book was a huge breakthrough for me, too. Because I was forcing myself to do it fast enough that I could really feel the pace of the book. When it dragged, I dragged. And I finally figured out that pacing is not a rheostat, to be turned up and down by adding or removing words. Pacing is about connecting with the reader. Those first 300 pages I’d written in the first draft? The pace was slow, sure. But I couldn’t have deleted words to make it better. No way. Without fierce conflict, it’s hard to pace well. And if you have a section of your book where the conflict is slow, you need to either (a) punch it up significantly, or (b) drop in a paragraph of tell and move on, because nobody cares.

    And sometimes, the way to make a scene pace faster is to slow it down. The conversation that’s critical to your black moment isn’t going to mean a damned thing to the reader if you delete all your heroine’s emotions to make it read faster.

    Sure, words can slow you down. But as a general rule, if your words aren’t doing work, you delete them. Words are not a speed bump, put in to make your reader get to the story slower.

    All this makes me wonder what I’m going to figure out on writing my next book.

    Does anyone have any startling breakthroughs they’ve made? I’d love to hear them!

  • 01Jan

    A lot of people are talking about goals. I have three lists of goals. One is my mid-year goals list–the things I want to accomplish by July of 2008. Then I have the 2008 goals list. And then I have my 10-year plan, for 2018.

    The one thing I always keep in mind is that I cannot have everything I want (sadly), and so I don’t make goals lists so I can strike off every item on the list. I expect to not achieve all my goals. That means I have to know what trumps what. So, for instance, on the ten year plan, I have listed “build my own home.” Because that is a dream of mine, and it would be nice. And another thing on that list is “have at least a million dollars in liquid assets.” Which would also be nice. I think that either of these things are attainable. It’s probably going to be difficult to do both. A third item on that list is “Have sex on every continent (including Antarctica).” Which may not exactly be compatible with the million dollars, either.

    And so I have to know where my priorities are. Of the the three, the one that is (obviously) highest priority is. . . . The third one. Obviously. And yes, I’m serious. Because at the end of my life, I am not going to lean back and say, “I had a million bucks when I was forty.” And while I might enjoy the process of acquiring a custom-built home, I know myself well enough to know that 90% of the time I spend there will consist of my ignoring my surroundings because I am enraptured in what I am reading or writing. I just don’t pay attention to what’s going on around me.
    But the third one not only involves two of my favorite activities, it’s one that will make a lot of memories and bring me closer to Mr. Milan. And so if I have to sacrifice the other goals to get that one, I’ll do it.

    Remember: Goals are dreams. Goals are not death sentences. Don’t pursue them just because you want to cross them off your list. If you stop wanting a goal, don’t be afraid to give it up.

    With those cheery, encouraging words for 2008, I wish everyone all the best! Happy New Year!

  • 31Dec
    Categories: Writing Comments: 5

    I see I have not blogged once in December. That is because all of my writing words have been going into the sidebar. My head hurts with how far that progress bar has moved. I know it says “Ornithology Revisions,” implying that I have been revising pages. Ha ha ha. How I wish that were the case. Of those pages–written between 11/9 and today–zero have been revised, and all have been completely, one hundred percent new.

    And these are not words written with my internal editor completely off, either. I have rules. I have page counts I have to hit every weekday, and then on the weekends, I have to stitch those counts together into actual scenes and chapters. Everything that I’ve stitched together I’ve gone over two or three times. I cannot explain how much this has hurt to do, day after day after day. On the other hand, it’s really amazing to see how productive I can be when I force myself to it. All the cool kids are blogging about their Golden Heart judging experiences, and so I thought I’d say a few words. I got the Young Adult category. Seven entries. Of those seven entries, three of them were what I’d call “not quite ready for prime time.” The writing was stilted or sloppy; there were obvious errors in the text, obvious motivational flaws. In one case, the entry was quite short–think under 1/3rd the required pages.Three of those entries had really great pages. The concepts were generally good, the conflict was there, and the writing was snappy. I gave these entries scores ranging from 7 to almost a 9. What was the difference? I had never imagined that this would be the case, but the difference was the synopsis. And by “the synopsis,” I mean that two out of these three entries had synopses that actively hurt them. The first one was fatally wounded by a synopsis that read like a hook from a query letter–and it was approximately that long. It was a great hook, too. But–what happens? Who runs away from home? What’s the black moment? What’s the resolution? I agonized about how to score this one. Ultimately, I decided I had to give it a lower score than I thought the pages might have merited. Without knowing if the author can really put together a decent story–with a heart-wrenching climax and a happily ever after–I can’t really give the author a score that says, “go ahead–final in the Golden Heart!” A great synopsis, one that really made me believe the author knew how to craft a great and exciting story, could have netted this entry as high as a 9.

    The middle score I gave was for great, but not absolutely golden pages. Again, a great synopsis could have gotten this entry a 9. What I read was good. But the synopsis felt like a series of “and in this chapter, she does X.” There was no understanding of story structure, no emphasis of moments important to the internal or the romantic conflict. And so I was left with the feeling that the book was a bit of a hodge-podge.

    The final entry I got I gave a score really close to a 9. The synopsis had a hint of voice and sparkle. It emphasized all the right moments. It made me understand what the black moment meant for each of the characters, and showed how the subplot played into the black moment’s resolution. Was it the best synopsis on earth? No, probably not. But a bad synopsis would have put this entry probably somewhere around the low 7s. The great one pushed it into the territory where, if other judges agree, it will final.

    So that’s my golden heart advice for all you junkies out there: Spend more time on your synopsis. Remember that your synopsis tells a story; it doesn’t summarize your book. Yes, it’s the thirty-minute TV special of your book. But you’re still telling that story.

    You’ll notice that I haven’t talked about one of my entries yet. The entry actually had a decent synopsis. The writing was not bad, although it was a little stilted in places. All things not considered, it should have been around a 6 or so. I thought about this one for a really long time. I know the guidelines said that it’s not fair to say “I don’t like such and such a story,” and to ask myself whether the story is a good story of that particular ilk.My problem–and remember, this is a supposedly young adult story–is that I would rather gouge the eyes out of any young adult than let thm think that this kind of story is a romance. The h/h relationship was child molestation–she was 14, he was twice that age, and their first sexual experience was an assault. The black moment was when she discovered he was married. And no, the HEA was not her chopping his balls off. It was their getting married–with no explanation of what happened to the prior wife. I am okay with reading stories about child molestation where older men marry much younger women. It’s just that usually I like the author to recognize that it is disturbing–like Kahlid Husseini’s “A Thousand Splendid Suns”–and to pay the bastard back in the end. I decided it was not horrible to say I did not like stories glorifying child rape, and I graded accordingly. That is a very different thing than saying “I do not like books about astronauts.” I thought about not posting this, because the author might recognize herself. But honestly, if you read this and you recognize what I am describing as your story, then GO GET COUNSELING!

  • 30Nov

    Is what FedEx says of Ornithology.

    Yikes.  This last week has been crazy.  I’m hoping to sleep a little for once!

     But after that, it’s all revisions, all the time.  The good thing about entering the GH is it gives me a very firm deadline for when I want my revisions to be done–something I wouldn’t have otherwise.

    What do you use for motivation?  And is anyone else as tired right now as I am?  :)

  • 21Nov

    This morning, I mailed my first Golden Heart entry ever off.  I spent way too much time on the synopsis, and I never would have been able to get even the final version–which I dubbed “doesn’t harm me”–right without numerous other people to help me out.  Goodbye, Legalese!

     Stupidly, I have decided to also enter my first novel, which means I am going to spend Thanksgiving frantically rewriting–when I’m not cooking.  And writing another darned synopsis.  Drat.

     May all of you have a wonderful Thanksgiving holiday!  Travel safely, eat well, and–if, like me, you’re ramping up for the Golden Heart–revise like the wind!

  • 14Nov
    Categories: Reviews Comments: 11

    There are very few authors that I’m truly rabid about. These are the authors where I go through the bookstore and face out copies of their work. I make sure there are plenty of copies on the new release table on the day it’s released. If I see someone browsing the section, I might just slip them a copy and say, “try this one!” High on that list of authors is Julie Anne Long, who writes with a vivacious good humor that is coupled with one of the most dazzling descriptive talents in the historical market.I was lucky enough to get an ARC of the Perils of Pleasure, and I have to say this: those of you who have not yet read it, are in for a pleasurable (but perilous!) ride. First things first. Madeleine is probably the strongest Julie Anne Long heroine yet, and for those of you who are familiar with JAL’s heroines, that is saying a lot. JAL doesn’t write wimpy women. Madeleine isn’t one of those “I’m so strong I’m brittle” girls, either–she has her moments of brittleness (don’t we all?) but she’s clever, capable, and she doesn’t ever fold, no matter how tough the going is.

    And the going is really tough in this one. This isn’t your typical Regency, where the strong (headstrong) girl captures the heart of a rake with her heartwarming antics. It’s not a book where the woman wields the power of love to save the dour Lord. Nope; Madeleine makes her appearance on the stage with a literal bang, when she whisks Colin away from a crowd of thousands of people, swarming around the gallows where he is intended to hang. You’d think he’d be grateful, right? Perhaps–if she wasn’t planning on tying him up and handing him to a stranger in exchange for a tremendous sum of money.

    And that’s only the beginning. Matters get worse and worse as the story progresses, covering terrain ranging from dark to darker yet, and touching on family secrets that might inspire a murder. Madeleine never takes a back seat to Colin, and yet she never has to be anything other than the competent woman she is. That’s typical for JAL, but this book is a real departure from her other works in one prominent way–there’s a lot more suspense. And even though her last trilogy touched on spies and treason, it did so with a much lighter touch than this book. Throughout it all, I found JAL’s characterization to be very strong. One of the overarching themes of this book is that despite the dark deeds being done, there are no real villains. Most of the people responsible for the darkness are those motivated to achieve goals that are essentially good. But they act without regards to the consequences, which are often horrific.

    In that sense, this is also a louder book than any of the ones JAL has ever written. The message of caring about the path that you take, rather then the goal in mind, is one that her hero and heroine both need to learn for themselves if they ever expect to find love with each other.

    This is a very different book than JAL has ever produced before. It’s wonderful to see authors–especially the ones I most adore–branching out and trying something new. It’s even better when I see them producing something I’ve never seen in a Regency-set historical–something that’s cold without being angsty, and suspenseful without invoking the Napoleonic war. And it’s best of all when it’s coupled with JAL’s delicious description.

    So the real question is this: Do I like it as much as I liked my favorites of her other books? I wish I could say. This book has the most powerful setting, the most powerful plot, and the most powerful message out of any book she’s delivered. But I don’t think it’s as emotionally powerful as some of her other masterpieces–like Ways to be Wicked, for instance. I’m not sure if that’s a function of the darkness of the plot, or whether it’s something that will get woven back in as she experiments with this new setting.

    In any event, this book is a must-read. Over the last few months, I’ve heard–over and over–that the historical is back. I’m pretty sure that’s right–but I don’t think it’ll ever be “back” in precisely the same way that it was in the good old days. It’s authors like Julie Anne Long who will be shaping the face of the new historical market, and books like this that will help do so.

  • 07Nov

    So, this is not a post about writing–at least not directly.  It’s a post about my mother.  Mrs. Milan, if you will.  My mother is in town.  During this time, she talked to someone I work with, and when that person asked her what she did, she shrugged her shoulders and hunkered down and said in a quiet voice, “Oh, nothing significant.”

    Gah!  I prodded her in the shoulder, and then told the person that she was writing a series of books for parents of very young children, based on her experiences both as a schoolteacher and as a mother.  She has a research agenda and as a schoolroom teacher her methods were overwhelmingly successful.  She has a unique ability to get into someone’s head and understand why they’re not learning–what little thing it is that they can’t quite get.  And then she figures out how to communicate it.  This, she says, is “nothing significant.”  And when I questioned (okay, when I bullied) her about her word choice later, she said that little things like teaching kids and books for parents just don’t seem all that important.

    Gah.  It made me think of how many times we women tend to downplay the feminine side of things we do.  I know I used to.

    Friend: What are you reading?

    Me, hiding cover of romance: Oh, nothing.

    It wasn’t until I got rabid that I started telling people that I read romances.  That I started realizing how hiding this part of myself told people it was okay to belittle romances, and by extension, okay to tell women that their desires–stability, family, friends, love–were not as important as gunshot wounds and war zones.  That the best things in life were just not that significant.

    So, tell me:  What have you learned to stand up for?  Is there anything you wish you had the guts to say?

  • 04Nov
    Categories: Legalese Comments: 14

    Although not. By “done” I mean that the bones of the story are in place. There is a lot of work to be done in those final pages–both in trimming some portions, expanding others, clarifying key emotions in important points.

    And that doesn’t count the inevitable rewrite or three. But for now, I’m popping open a bottle of wine. I deserve it!