Archive for the ‘Random’ Category

Google Books Notification

Monday, August 24th, 2009

Last week, Scott Gant, an author (also a lawyer), filed an objection to the Google Books Settlement.  His objection is very interesting; you should read it yourself if you are into this kind of thing.  Gant wrote a book called We’re All Journalists Now: The Transformation of the Press and Reshaping of the Law in the Internet Age. As you may be able to guess from the title, Gant is not a Luddite. He is not the kind of person who believes that things should go back to the good ol’ days when books were on paper and whippersnappers like Google didn’t digitize anything. He raised several points about the settlement that I found interesting.

One of them is this: Usually, in a class action lawsuit, there needs to be a serious effort made to provide all plaintiffs covered by the settlement with individual notice, to make sure that they have heard about it. Typically this is handled by mailing identifiable class members a piece of paper describing the settlement. This is a step that has allegedly not been taken at this point. For instance, Gant never received individual notice–even though he would be one of the unnamed plaintiffs who is easiest to find. If Gant’s allegations (both about the legal requirement and the lack of notice) are true, this is a serious defect.

I conducted a non-scientific survey on RWA-PAN. As of this writing, I’ve received 25 responses from people who I can verify are covered by the settlement (that means, I have affirmatively looked up their book(s) in the copyright registry, or they have a foreign copyright with a country covered by the Berne Convention).  Eight of those people–a little less than 33%–have received individual notification. The remainder have not. Some of the people who have not received notification have addresses clearly marked on the Library of Congress copyright registration; almost all of them are still receiving royalties from their publishers. Edited to read: “have books still in print with their publisher,” as I did not inquire as to royalty status. I can only verify that I can get books through Amazon.  Some of the people who have not been notified are still receiving royalties from have books in print with publishers who are named plaintiffs to the case.

This was not a scientific survey, and numerous objections to the bare statistics (authors may not remember receiving notice) as well as the legal conclusions (individual notice may not be required) Gant discusses can be raised.  I don’t pretend to represent this as anything other than a set of interesting numbers.

Still, this interesting set of numbers definitely makes me sit back and say, hmm.

All things bookmark!

Monday, July 27th, 2009

I’ve fielded a few e-mails about the bookmarks I was giving away at Nationals.  Here they are:

bookmarks1

And just because that doesn’t quite give you an idea of the shimmery goodness that is the bookmark, try this:

bookmarks2

As you can see, the bookmark has a few distinctive features.  It’s die cut.  And it’s not just a die cut with rounded corners or a leaf shape; it’s a die cut with a pattern.  (The pattern is drawn from one of the random dividers that shows up on my website.  This one, to be exact: )

It has my name in gold foil.  Shiny!

And it has accents picked out in spot UV.

There were two parts to getting this bookmark made: the design, and the printing.

The printing was the easy part.  I used 4colorprint.com.  I have had excellent luck with them.  I’ve used them to print both business cards and bookmarks now, and both have turned out beautifully.  There are some places you can go to get bookmarks printed more cheaply, but I haven’t found anywhere else that has the quality that 4colorprint has (in terms of the stock they use to print on, the quality of the printing, and the breadth of finishing options).  All I had to do was mail them a file, and lo and behold, after a short space of time, I had gorgeous bookmarks.  I highly recommend 4colorprint for printing interesting and difficult files.

(Incidentally, I was also moving right around the time when I ordered my bookmarks.  I asked them to get in touch with me to make sure everything went to the right address, and the staff was fantastic about touching base with me about my order to make sure everything was squared away.  So many things could have gone wrong with that.  Not one did.)

The design part was harder.  Much harder.  I started with the idea that I wasn’t going to be scared of spending a little bit more than your every day average bookmark, but I didn’t want to spend insane amounts more.  I also think it helped to start with a goal in mind: I wanted a bookmark that (a) made people want to pick it up; (b) made them want to hold it to look at it; and (c) hesitate for at least a split second before tossing it in the trash.

With that in mind, one great resource I used in trying to figure out what sorts of things appealed to me was this Flickr photoset of business cards.  Some of them didn’t appeal to me.  Some seemed a little too gimmicky for me (and also too hard to store–so they would probably get tossed fairly quickly). Others made me want to reach right into my screen to pick them up and examine them in minute detail.  I also walked through bookstores and looked at book covers that caught my eye.

And then I played around.  For a long time.  You can hire someone to do this for you, but it helps substantially if you have an idea what you’re shooting for, and so don’t necessarily bypass the “looking for things you like” phase.

My critique partner, Tessa Dare, also had gorgeous bookmarks–and you can see them on her site, here.  In fact, she’ll even send you some for free!

To serial comma or not to serial comma

Monday, February 23rd, 2009

The serial comma is the final comma between a list of items.  A serial comma-ist may write something like: I went to the store and got bread, apples, and eggs.

A non serial comma-ist would write:  I went to the store and got bread, apples and eggs.

Serial-comma activists insist that the serial comma is necessary to avoid ambiguities such as this:  I dedicate this book to my parents, Ayn Rand and God. Which implies that your parents are Ayn Rand and God.

However, I have noticed that my use of the serial comma on my website creates ambiguity:  Courtney Milan lives in the Pacific Northwest with her husband, a marginally-trained dog, and an attack cat. Which rather implies that my husband is a marginally-trained dog.  Of course, this ambiguity can be avoided by switching clause order:  Courtney Milan lives in the Pacific Northwest with an attack cat, a marginally-trained dog, and her husband. But I think I’ll keep it the way it is.

Mr. Milan is my favorite marginally trained dog!

Er….

Wednesday, February 11th, 2009

So, there’s a discussion on Smart Bitches about what things an author can and can’t say online, and at what point people get turned off by an author.  It makes me nervous, because while I try very, very hard to be sweet and nice and gracious . . . okay, let’s face it, I went to law school for a reason.  And that reason had nothing to do with my being sweet and nice and able to handle confrontation in a gracious manner.  When I get an idea in my head, I am about as gracious as a bulldog with lockjaw.

One of the extremely practical reasons I decided not to post about politics on this blog had nothing to do with turning people away with my political beliefs, and everything to do with the fact that I handle disagreements more like a lawyer and less like an author who thinks that all viewpoints are valid.  (Although I do think other viewpoints are valid!  Sometimes!  Although definitely not if your viewpoint is on the content of law and is inconsistent with fifty years of Supreme Court precedent.  It is just that I show my, er, appreciation by jumping up and down on other viewpoints, trampoline style, to see what survives, rather than handling them like unique and delicate flowers.)

So this whole Suzanne Brockman thing has me in a bit of an uncomfortable tither–because that could so easily be me.  I would be SO MUCH WORSE than she is under these circumstances.  And yes, I could say that she shouldn’t have said this or shouldn’t have said that.  But my argument style tends to be more along the lines of shoot first, interrogate the bleeding corpse later, and then chop its head off and bury the body in unconsecrated ground if it doesn’t have a satisfactory answer.  It’s not a pretty sight.  And the scary thing is that I have toned myself down SO MUCH over the last ten years.

I am fairly certain that at some point in my career, I am going to say something I shouldn’t, and then I will dig myself into a hole by trying to explain where I’m coming from.

I am toast.  That is all.

Pictures

Tuesday, February 3rd, 2009

So I’m getting my official photo taken today.  I really hate getting my picture taken.  Part of the problem is that when I was much, much younger, my older brother told me that when your picture gets taken, a little bit of your soul got sucked out–and as proof, submitted that models were always airheads.  (I don’t know why soulless was so easily translated into brainless.)  In any event, I never believed him.  But since my older brother was basically in charge of the family (Courtney mentions oh so casually), I had no choice but to obey his wishes, which meant that every time Dad took out his camera, we had to scream and run away and hide, or make faces so ridiculously contorted that Dad would give up on getting a decent photo.

The problem is that habit persists today, even when I wish I wouldn’t.  Well, not the screaming and running away part–today, I am paying someone actual money to take pictures of me.  No; the part that’s still there is the making faces bit.  I don’t know why it is, but I always manage to have the dumbest look on my face when people take pictures of me.

The worst part is when people try to reassure me.  “What are you talking about?” they ask.  “You look perfectly normal in that picture.”

AAAHHHHHHH!!!!!  I look like that all the time?!

Thanks

Wednesday, January 21st, 2009

This is what I had hoped to see on Day One.

It pays few political dividends.  It doesn’t jumpstart the economy or do anything to address the hard problems of health care, education, or energy efficiency.

It just shows integrity and a commitment to the rule of law.  It demonstrates that the oath he swore to preserve, protect, and defend our Constitution had real meaning other than lip service.

Thank you for this one.

Lawsuits

Monday, January 19th, 2009

Even though I don’t list it in my tongue-in-cheek biography, I am a lawyer–even though I am not now a practicing lawyer.  One of the things I think I learned as a lawyer is that civil lawsuits are an ineffective way of making people happy–and people often file suit, not out of coldly rational calculus, but because they are trying to fill an unmet emotional need.  It may sound great to win a giant verdict, but 95% of the time, a favorable ruling is an ephemeral brass ring that disappears once you touch it.

I started thinking about this a few days ago, when Kristin posted on her blog about cover consultations.  One of the commenters suggested that someday, a publisher would be sued, and an injunction obtained, over cover consultation.  It might happen one day–but it struck me as such a horribly wrong-headed approach to the matter, that I’ve been thinking about the problem presented for days.

It won’t surprise you to hear that some lawyers advise clients, when faced with a potential lawsuit, to avoid admitting guilt or providing information.  After all, if you say, “I’m sorry, it was my fault,” in court, they will ask you, “Hey, didn’t you say it was your fault?”  And you will have to answer yes, and then you will lose.  But there was a rather startling study produced by the Journal of American Medicine a few years ago that found that in malpractice cases, lawsuits went down if someone sat down with the people in question, told them precisely what went wrong, admitted fault and responsibility, and told them how they’d taken measures to prevent such accidents in the future.

Why?  Personally, I think it’s because most people don’t file lawsuits because they’re trying to get the money or because they honestly believe it is the best step to take in their careers.  Most people file lawsuits because they’ve been hurt, they are angry, and they want to feel vindicated.  They file lawsuits because they’ve stopped seeing the person they care about as human and real, and they see them only as an adversary to be ground into the dust.  Adding that human touch–letting the patients know that the doctors did care, and responded to their pain and wanted to do what was right–made a huge difference.  Ultimately, people know that a lawsuit will never bring Grandma back.  But being treated by the medical professionals as if you are human instead of a walking, talking liability helped them channel their grief and anger in some way other than lashing out legally.

I’m not trying to say that lawsuits serve no purpose.  They do, obviously, and they’ve done great (and terrible) things for our society.  I’m not even trying to say that you shouldn’t sue doctors for malpractice.  If a doctor is incompetent, she should not be treating patients, and I approve of methods that make it impossible for that doctor to earn a living.

But I do think that your life will be happier and more free of stress if you try not to find a lawsuit everywhere you look.  This is especially true of publishing contracts.  Most of what I saw in my publishing contract was about two sides working together.  I’m going to give them a timely product that is the best work I can do.  They’re going to let me know how to make it even better, and I’m going to listen–because we both want the same thing, which is for my books to capture as many readers as possible.

And I don’t see how I could have that relationship if I thought of the contract, and our agreement, as an adversarial one.

Sometimes, this relationship breaks down.  (When it does, it leads to cringeworthy train wrecks on Dear Author that leave me noting to myself that I will never, ever under any circumstances work for a publishing house where managers tell authors to shut up or sue.)  But most of the time, you don’t hear anything about it–except thanks, from authors to editors and publishing house staff, for all their hard work.

Website Redesign

Wednesday, January 7th, 2009

I’m officially announcing that I’ve redone my website!

As 2009 approached, and I realized I was going to have published material out this year, I realized I wanted a newsletter (shameless plug:  sign up for my newsletter!).  This lead to a site redesign.  Among other things, my site now changes colors every month, and it takes a page from Google–on some major holidays, and on a few very minor ones that you wouldn’t think of as holidays as well, it changes in less subtle ways.

For a limited time, go see my website in the future–as it will look on October 31, 2009.  Spooky!

Beyond the fold, I talk about what I was smoking when I redid my website.

(more…)

Politics and the Blogging Author

Wednesday, September 3rd, 2008

It is the political season, and in some sense, it feels very strange to let that time go by without comment on this blog.  That is because–I have to admit it–I am a politics junky.  I like keeping abreast with what’s happening (although I don’t have a TV–it’s all newspapers and online youtube clips, which these days encompasses everything).  I think about policy.  I care about the result of this election.

It somehow, though, seems almost . . . wrong . . . to blog about it as an author.

Why?  It’s what a friend of mine calls “jurisdictional boundaries”–big words that basically mean, if I am wearing my Author Hat, I shouldn’t surprise you all by putting on a big Politics Hat.  You didn’t ask for it.  You don’t care what I think.  If you want politics, you’ll open your OpEd page.  At best, you want to read my books–I hope you want to read my books.  So as an author, politics are not my bailiwick.

Likewise, you shouldn’t care whether your doctor votes Democrat or Republican, as long as she’s a good doctor.  You shouldn’t care if your doctor supports raising the social security age, nor should you switch physicians because you discover that she just doesn’t get what all the fuss is about Harry Potter.  None of that matters to the fine art of doctoring.

But there are small pieces of overlap.  For instance, I would want to know what my doctor thought about the quality of local water.  And, truthfully, no matter how little a writer says about politics, her books inevitably betray at least some of the things that are nearest and dearest to her heart.  So do you disclose it?  Do you admit that it’s been done that way on purpose?  It’s never intended as a lecture, but when an author chooses a “happily ever after,” the way she makes her characters happy often shows what she thinks people need.

Likewise, while I never plan to make this blog political, and especially not overtly so, is it horrible to think about becoming a supporter of my favored person on Facebook?

How much is too much?  I’d love to hear thoughts on this.

Movie Logline Pitch

Saturday, July 26th, 2008

As conference rears its mighty head in the not-too-distant future (days?!  When did it become mere days away?), loops and blogs have gone haywire as people practice pitches.  There are the short-paragraph pitches, designed to capture the conflict in the book and boil it down to its essence.  There are single sentence pitches.  And then there’s the movie pitch.

Apparently, this works like this:  someone says, “It’s a cross between NORTH BY NORTHWEST and STEEL MAGNOLIAS.”  Everyone sits around and nods sagely, understanding precisely what the book is about.  Apparently, this makes a lot of sense to them.

Confession time:  I write historicals because my knowledge of pop culture is pea-sized.  I see movies–on occasion.  In fact (she says proudly) in the last two years, I have seen five movies, which is about as many movies as I saw in the first ten years of my life.  My pop culture knowledge is increasing at an exponential rate!  (Unfortunately, pop culture is increasing at an exponential rate, too, and its exponent is bigger.)  None of the movies I have seen are like my book.  So my movie lexicon is a little skimpy, to say the least.  And even those movies that I have seen, I can’t quite figure out how to cram into a pitch.  I imagine that if I tried it, it would come out like this.

Person:  Tell me about your book.

Me:  It’s kind of like, WHEN HARRY MET SALLY.  Except without Harry.  Or Sally.

Person: Uh.  So what’s left?

Me:  Meeting?

SO.  Moving along, then.  This looks to be a fruitless endeavor for me, but that’s no reason you should stop!  Tell me what movies your book is like!  If I have seen both movies, you will win!

What will you win, you ask?  Glory!  Heaps and heaps of glory!  Also, potentially something else that I am too lazy (and too busy packing) to think of now.


Courtney Milan’s Blog is proudly powered by WordPress
entries (RSS) and comments (RSS).
content © Courtney Milan, 2006-2009
author photo © Jovanka Novakovic | bauwerks.com
cover copyright © 2010 harlequin enterprises limited
cover art used by arrangement with harlequin enterprises limited. all rights reserved.
® and ™ are trademarks of harlequin enterprises limited and/or its affiliated companies, used under license
home \"home books \"books about \"about contact \"contact faqs \"faq articles \"articles